Isaac Hayes Enterprises v. Trump is a copyright infringement case in the Northern District of Georgia that was allowed to proceed, in part, against defendant Donald J. Trump — but claims against a political action committee called Turning Point Action (“TPA”) were dismissed. Isaac Hayes Enterprises is the entity that manages the rights of legendary singer,…
Alcon Entertainment, LLC v. Tesla, Inc., et al. is a case from the Central District of California involving fast cars, motion pictures, copyright infringement, and a healthy dose of politics. Elon Musk found himself and his company, Tesla, in the crosshairs of Alcon Media (“Alcon”), which produced the remake of the classic post-apocalyptic film Blade…
Martineau v. Bungie is a case from the Eastern District of Louisiana that pits a blogging David against a gaming Goliath that allegedly had to create a plot for one of its video games in a hurry. Matthew Kelsey Martineau filed a complaint against Bungie Inc. for infringement within the extremely popular, multiplayer game Destiny…
I had always wondered how the TTAB could know whether someone had a sufficient intent, and that question was answered in a case called Tequila Cuadra S. de RL de CV v. Manufacturera de Botas Cuadra, S.A. de C.V. The presumption that the applicant intended to use the trademark CUADRA was toppled by another company…
TOP Tobacco v. Star Importers and Wholesalers was a case that considered the relationship between statutory damages and actual damages. Defendants appealed to the Eleventh Circuit to review the amount of statutory damages that the jury awarded in the Northern District of Georgia. TOP Tobacco (“TOP”) is the manufacturer of TOP and JOB popular brands…
This is the story of cannabis fertilizer producer infringing on the trademark of the senior user. In Athena Incorporated v. Advanced Nutrients, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington (Seattle), Athena sought a preliminary injunction against trademark infringement by Advanced Nutrients for using not just the name, but the logo…
Concord Music Group et al. v. Anthropic PBC was a case in the Northern District of California involving another artificial intelligence company defending itself against hypothetical infringement. Anthropic is a technology company whose main product is an artificial intelligence called Claude. Anthropic trains Claude by creating a training corpus, which consists of large amounts of…
An employer sued a former employee and his new employer in North Carolina state court over allegedly divulging trade secrets in Atkore v. Keith D. Dinkheller et al.. Late last year, the defendants brought a motion to dismiss all counts in Atkore’s complaint, obtaining a somewhat surprising result. Mr. Dinkheller had worked in numerous leadership…
BBK Tobacco and Foods v. Central Coast Agricultural Inc. was a case in the District of Arizona set in the now-familiar landscape of cannabis-related IP disputes. BBK manufactures smoke-related products such as rolling papers bearing the trademark RAW, and Central Coast Agricultural, Inc. (CCA) markets and sells cannabis products — and attempted to register the…
Westmont Living, Inc. v. Retirement Unlimited, Inc. is a trademark infringement case that originated in the Eastern District of Virginia and was appealed to the Fourth Circuit. At issue were competing motions to dismiss. A senior-living company called Westmont Living had the registered trademark WESTMONT LIVING, which they claimed Retirement Unlimited (RUI) infringed with its…