Sorrento Therapeutics v. Anthony Mack was a complex case argued in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The case involved using California law to validate a non-compete agreement to determine liability in Delaware. The court then considered defendant Mack’s opposition to plaintiffs’ subsequent fee petition. In the liability stage, the court ruled against Mack for stealing…
Palantir Technologies, Inc. v. Radha Jain, et al. is an ongoing case in the Southern District of New York about stolen trade secrets and overly broad non-compete agreements. Here, Palantir sought a temporary restraining order (TRO) to stop defendants from using the information in question during the pendency of the trial, in addition to requiring…
DejaVuAI v. Kapustin is a case from the Western District of Washington that began as a claim of breach of fiduciary duty and became a case about the misappropriation of trade secrets under the Defend Trade Secrets Act (DTSA). At issue here was a motion to convert a temporary restraining order against the defendant into…
“Reprehensible” is a strong word, but that’s how a state court described the conduct of Phillips 66 in a trade secret case brought by the much smaller Propel Fuels. Propel Fuels, Inc. v. Phillips 66 Company was a case in the Superior Court of California that arose after a long courtship between the two companies…