Flycatcher v. Affable Avenue, LLC. was a case in the Southern District of New York in which hallucinated citations from a large language model ended in sanctions for the offending attorney. Affable Avenue, represented by Steven Feldman, was among over a dozen defendants in the suit brought by Flycatcher. After Feldman entered a motion to dismiss,…
In the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California’s case Bartz v. Anthropic PBC (which we wrote about here), the parties reached a historic settlement. It aims to distribute $1.5 billion among authors and publishers whose pirated works were used to train Anthropic’s large language model called Claude. The datasets made from the…
Concord Music Group et al. v. Anthropic PBC was a case in the Northern District of California involving another artificial intelligence company defending itself against hypothetical infringement. Anthropic is a technology company whose main product is an artificial intelligence called Claude. Anthropic trains Claude by creating a training corpus, which consists of large amounts of…
Kohls v. Ellison is an ongoing case in the U.S. District Court, District of Minnesota concerning the state’s anti-digital manipulation law (Minn. Stat. 609.771), which prohibits the use of so-called deepfakes in political campaigning. Deep fakes are digitally manipulated videos, pictures, or audio that generally make people appear to be doing something that never happened. …
Raw Story Media v. Open AI, Inc. was a case filed in the Southern District of New York involving the generative artificial intelligence app ChatGPT. The court dismissed the case before the parties even started discovery. A group of news media companies sued the collection of companies that make up ChatGPT. The organizations suing Open…